PABLO DAVIS - WEB JOURNAL

 

- Web Journal entry, August 4, 2005 -Letter to a fellow professional artist -
mesothelioma Visits to this journal

Dear Frank,
I want to write to you about something I feel about you that is very important.  I have noticed an element of sadness in your work of late.  That doesn’t seem to match the happy person I know you to be.  Why has this sadness crept into your work?  I know you are trying to make a living as an artist.  I have traveled that path and this is what I’d like to share with you about it.

This is the way it works in America for an artist.  In order to survive with your painting you have to work on many jobs; some of them menial, low-paying, just to keep you and people who depend on you, alive. That’s why I want to share my life experience with you.  Pablo Davis today, in his old age, 89 years old, is touted in the media as being a “great artist” renowned, professional, and successful.  Well, I am not really any of these.

When I was eight years old I worked briefly on a job in south Philadelphia which was a concentrated Italian community.  Walking around in the great marketplace, selling men’s socks and neckties, I shouted my wares, “Five cents a piece.”   I worked from 6 in the morning ‘til 11 at night.  Pay? $1.00.  When I was 14 years old I worked in a coal mine 1800 feet below the surface for 28 cents an hour. That was during the depth of the great depression when there was no work even for grown men, so we near starved.

A big part of my artistic life was the time I spent with Rivera and Kahlo, but that trip was made by hopping trains and spending a grand total of 60 cents - hardly an economic gain for me.

When I was in high school I worked after school for the A&P store produce department for $8 a week.  I helped unload big semis bringing food to the store and even at my small stature (150 lbs.) I would carry on my shoulders 2 sacks of sugar or potatoes, each weighing a hundred pounds.  I would carry them from the truck, up a flight of stairs to the second floor.  No wonder I ended up with several hernias.  When I was 18 years old, just out of high school, I worked briefly for Kohl Brothers’ Circus on a flying trapeze, 40 feet up, for $3.00 a day.  It’s true that when I was in art school, only by the grace of an anonymous scholarship donor, I did receive three or four commissions from the Saturday Evening Post and book publishers. All this while I was producing drawings and paintings and studying to perfect my art.  Through these periods, sometimes many weeks went by before I did any art. When I’d come back to my work I either imagined or maybe it was true that I thought that I had gained something from my work experience.  At least it made me feel better.

My first high-paying job out of art school was as an industrial designer for Philco corporation.  I had just come off a low-paying, rather disgusting job producing ads for the yellow pages of the phone book.  During all this period of my life I suffered with tuberculosis.  After  I’d been with Philco a year, I had a tubercular breakdown and was shipped to the National Jewish Hospital in Denver, where by the grace of God and man’s discovery of antibiotics, my tuberculosis was cured and I lived...and I lived.   Even though my first one-man show was in the prestigious Whitney Museum in New York, (due to the influence of my art teacher, Franklin Watkins), and was a successful show that sold out, the fame and fortune I experienced was fleeting.  Just as my career seemed destined to take off, Hitler’s fascism was taking over the world and Jews were being murdered by the millions. I myself one, I could not stand aside both as a human being and as an artist.  I therefore volunteered to try to stop fascism in Spain.

Unfinished.....
 


- Web Journal entry, August 14 - Sunday

A Stay in France, 1946

Interview of Pablo Davis

 

My bedroom was plain, about ten by twelve feet in dimension, with a wooden floor, a wooden four-poster bed and a huge feather comforter.  There was only one decoration; a painting of a mother and child.  It was so tender and inspiring to go to sleep to and wake up to. It was an original painting by Picasso, who wasn’t afraid to show his tender side. In fact, this home was full of original works by Picasso because this was Picasso’s own home in Valauris, France.

 

I’d been invited by Picasso a few years earlier when he came to visit me as I suffered in a field hospital near Paris, injured by a German bayonet during my fight against fascism in the Spanish Civil War.  I recovered with some nasty scarring but here I was now, eager to wake up every morning for another tremendous day.  The view from my window was breathtaking.  The fields were defined by rows of gorgeous trees and were full of spring-like greens and light sandy colored earth.  I could also see some destruction by German aircraft which left some sections of trees down, some broken buildings, and a completely destroyed church.

 

In the distance, there was a business section with a marvelous bakery.  Wonderful, friendly, jolly bakers made sumptuous hard-crusted French breads from a brick oven and marvelous pastries.  The pastries were everything.  Beautiful to look at; crispy, fruity, nutty, delicate, sugary, and chocolaty.  Picasso was addicted to some of those pastries.  That bakery was a symbol of rebirth to the French citizens in that little area.  The food was so French.  It gave the people the feeling that France was still alive.  Walking into that bakery was like walking into a celebration every day.  I became part of a daily hugging and kissing celebration.  Another thing, the baker’s wife asked if I was married and when she found out I wasn’t she tried to fix me up with a few young French women.  There was a shortage of French men because so many had been killed in the war.  One day when I was coming back from the bakery, I ran into Picasso on his way to the pottery factory.  He jokingly said to me, “Did they try to fix you up with a girl?”  I laughed and said, “Yes.”  Then he said, “Don’t get tangled up with a French girl – I’ll introduce you to a great Spanish girl.”

 

The main employer of the town, the pottery works factory, had been badly damaged in the war but was rebuilt when Picasso, in an effort to get those men back to work, agreed to pay all the pottery workers’ salaries.  That put the town back on its feet.  Picasso learned to do ceramics from those grateful workers and produced some of the most exquisite pottery-work ever made.

 

Back to my life with Picasso and his wife, Jacqueline.  Often, I’d wake up in the very early morning and I’d greet Picasso who usually worked through the night.  He was very focused on his painting and seldom carried on a conversation at those times.  He had a sketching studio, two painting studios and a sculpting studio on the first floor.  He’d move from medium to medium and even painting to painting very quickly and with a great intensity.  It was amazing to see how much art could come from just one man.

 

The chateau had about twenty rooms, three bedrooms and six studios with very large diagonally-paned windows, that filled each room with large amounts of sunlight. Picasso gave me my own sunny studio space on the third floor and would come up often to see how I was doing.  His criticisms, both good and bad, were utterly honest; just what a young artist like me needed

 

  At breakfast-time I’d go to the kitchen where Jacqueline would insist on making my breakfast (But one had to be there before 9 a.m. because she didn’t make breakfast after that time!).  She took such good care of Picasso – she was totally in charge of everything except his art.  For breakfast she’d make a variety of foods – fruit tarts, oatmeal, eggs and breads to name a few.  During the meal we’d talk and eat Jacqueline’s delicious food.  Picasso would come from his studio and the first thing he always did was tell everyone a good joke.  Then he’d wash his big hands and hug and kiss Jacqueline, who would throw her arms around him as if she hadn’t seen him in weeks.  She was the most warm-hearted person there could be.  You could tell they warmed each others’ hearts.

 

Usually, one or more of Picasso’s children would be visiting and we all took joy in each others’ company.  Picasso would get down on the floor with his younger children and work on paintings and drawings with them.  Paul especially, would do a few brush strokes and then hand the brush to his father and say, “Now you do it.”  There was no sense of ego or celebrity at all.  He had this emotional Spanish kind of fathering with lots of hugging between him and his children.  It was only when a former wife would visit that there could be turmoil.  Some shouting  ~in Spanish.

 

Picasso’s chateau was made of squared-off sandy-colored stones covered with old vines and it welcomed many interesting visitors.  One afternoon Charlie Chaplin walked through the doorway.  He stayed about ten days and was joined there later by his wife Oona, Eugene O’Neill’s daughter.  I learned that Chaplin and Picasso had been great friends for years and that Chaplin owned quite a few of Picasso’s paintings.  The first night Chaplin was there he really got funny at dinner.  He made it look like the dinner rolls were his fingers and then got up and did a pantomime.  Picasso got up and pantomimed too to try to outdo Chaplin.  Well, Picasso pulled Jacqueline up and she outdid them both!  They were so creative and hilarious. [Kanweiler, Picasso’s agent, and Paul Allard, the brilliant writer, were there and were laughing their heads off too. Paul Allard was later assassinated by Franco’s forces, and just like the assassination of Martin Luther King in this country caused riots, the death of this beloved man spurred half of Europe to near revolution!]

 

After dinner, we’d have long conversations with our visitors, and sometimes, a drop or two of brandy. Everyone was fascinating but Chaplin was particularly so.  He was a very kind and soft-spoken and talked so well on everything but especially art, politics and current events.  He was a painter and a pianist too.  He played several of his compositions for us and there were simply beautiful.  Chaplin liked my work and that felt so good to me.

 

Every Friday, Kanweiler would visit to pick up new artwork to sell, and deliver money from the artwork he’d sold the previous week.  On one such Friday Picasso gave him his weekly stack of paintings and then brought him over to see a painting I’d done of a poor washerwoman.  Kanweiler said he was amazed at the variety of Picasso’s styles and choice of subject, and that he loved the painting.  Picasso winked and told him that it was my painting and that it should be in the Louvre.  Kanweiler agreed, and sold it to the Louvre that very week.  At the time, France was bankrupt (due to the war) so I was amazed when Kanweiler handed me $360 (U.S.) the next Friday.  I said I would have given the painting away with half my soul.  I later learned that, at that time, only 29 American artists were represented in the Louvre’s vast collection.  I am truly humbled to have been one of those artists.

 

At the end of those amazing days with Picasso and all the good people around him, I’d go to bed exhausted but so full of life.  As much as I loved Picasso and France, I was more in love with America and eventually returned to her  to make my own way and my own life.

 

   


- Web Journal Entry, August 15, 2005
Woke  around 5 a.m. and read a book on U.S. history.  Around 7 a.m. my upper lip started to swell to 5 times its normal size.  Much tenderness in my lip and upper gum  Pain in the nerves around the roots of my upper teeth.  This is the 4th time this has happened since June.  Cannot figure out why.  No typical allergic causes have been present for each of the 4 episodes.  Took 50 mg of Benadryl and started to feel dizzy, very tired, and even had a brief hallucination.  I reached out for something in front of me that wasn't really there.  Slept.  Someone grabbed my feet too hard and hurt my arthritic toes.  By 6 p.m. the swelling had reduced and I was able to eat.  Sang from a book of traditional folk songs with Jean's family.  Felt somewhat better by bedtime.  Need to get to my staff meeting at Bridging Communities in Detroit tomorrow morning. 

 

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

-Web journal entry, October 12, 2005

Written, by Pablo,  in the summer of 2005, to the person who commissioned this painting.

“The Portrait of Little Seven-Year- Old Megan”

 This seemed like an easy painting for me.  You watched me whip it out as I had painted about 3,000 portraits over the years like that and you were complimentary and enthusiastic as you saw the first complete image emerge on the canvas before your eyes in your living room.  You all seemed happy with it and I could have left it like that and signed it.

 But I quickly realized I had it all wrong.  I conceived what I thought would be a great portrait of Megan.  This first concept was based on an impression I had of a large living room wall in Megan’s house that Megan’s Dad had painted.  In my imagination the wall looked like a Monet, dreamy, misty, faint, a green, blue and brown wooded area.  I conceived posing Megan in front of that wall and imagined her emerging out of a subtle misty haze – very unified and undefined and at one with the background “wooded” area, sitting on an interesting wooden bench, a family heirloom crafted in Germany.

 My error.  As I painted I began to feel uneasy.  I began to see I had a superficial impression of how I characterized Megan, and was superimposing this atmosphere on her.  I was still proceeding to block-in the painting as first described.  I changed it radically twice, three times, but kept to the original concept.

 During this stage, I kept the painting very spontaneous with loose, rhythmical brush strokes evident – that’s my personal touch.  I was satisfied that the composition, color, and vigorous, rhythmical brush work would result in a quality work of art - but as I worked, I began to realize that while I was happy making art – I was not producing an accurate portrait, at the same time, of Megan.  My representation of her was emerging as suggestive but wrong.  I was discovering Megan in more depth and I was agonizing over the process inch by inch. 

 What was emerging was that Megan was no misty, Monet-like or “Alice in Wonderland” personality.  Instead, a more in-depth study of her finds her to be a very colorful person, intense, vigorous, self-assured, stubborn and difficult.  Hardly a child emerging mysteriously out of a misty, green woods!

 I had to move the whole first concept to this second stage if I wanted a successful honest portrait – but how to save the art in it?  That has come slowly, painfully.  I had to invent its evolution in strict conformity with the direction I was pressing of Megan’s character and image and I had no preconceived idea of this!  I let it emerge.  The bravura of my brush work was sacrificed to control what I was now after.  And so what I came to see was all wrong at first. I am now closer to the truth and originality about this child.  The painting stresses strength, color, clarity and definiteness – above all her presence - nothing misty.  That would not be her!

 But now I was confronted with a version of her staring out at me, of deep dark-set eyes, an insistent well-defined nose, and a somewhat aggressive and childishly sensuous mouth.  How did all that happen to come together from the transfer of a reconstructed Megan?  It still was not working.

 I took a revolutionary step.  I painted out the entire face.  I got rid of everything.  I have a blank area of the general shape of her face and head in a light “golden” (i.e., ochre) and slightly pink color, which is characteristic.  Then I began again.  But only when I had gathered a unified frame of mind and a clear, fresh vision of her so that with few, choice brush strokes of the right varieties of color, her character and likeness could emerge with her spirit and my spirit of the art of painting – merged.  Then and only then was I finished and willing to sign my name on it.

 From Picasso I learned that bold destruction of a painting when necessary, can lead to new and better living results.  I especially labored over the beautiful clothing that Megan’s mother searched for and gave so much thought and exquisite taste to for this painting.  I wanted any treatment of the dress, the deep velvety blue bodice and full-bodied skirt to be a tribute to Megan’s mother.  By doing so, she gave me, the artist, the opportunity to throw myself into an exciting and lively interpretation of Megan so that this portrait, in my opinion, emerges as a modern expressionist work of art.

 This struggle that I just tried to describe to you is a problem that arises only within the unique demands of high level portrait painting - and not in other kinds of painting.  Many good imaginative artists are not capable of dealing with this demand because it requires absolute honesty.  It is not like throwing colors freely on the canvas.  Great masters of portraiture are considered second rate now-a-days by art critics.  They even classify portrait art as a lower form of art.  Of course, if they are writing about paintings from photographs – or imitating substitutes of photos, they have a point.  Great portrait masters like Leonardo, Titian, Rembrandt, Goya (to name a few) and in our time, Sargent, tried and frequently succeeded in interpreting depth of character, sometimes the very soul of humanism in a person.  That’s portrait painting. 

Footnote:  This is a characteristic problem in painting for me – as it should be, because the problem arises only in the demands of portrait painting; a true grappling with the character of the subject.

 In portrait painting the artist is practicing a discipline with a live human person, a living subject (not something abstract) which the artist studies and analyzes to combine both realistic and abstract elements to create a serious composition of art.  Therefore the artist characterizes the subject not simply by painting his/her outward appearance, but combines that likeness with many other elements that go into the making of a true work of art.

 

TO SEE THIS PAINTING, go to the PHOTOS page of this website - near the end of that page

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Web Journal Entry, December 3, 2005

(Read at the Grosse Pointe Artists' Association, November 11, 2005)

 

Martin Luther King

Written by Pablo Davis the night MLK was murdered

April 3-4, 1968

 

 

Cease from anger.

Forsake your wrath.

Forgive.

So make your strength

Unbreakable.

Work patiently,

But not through patience.

Wait no longer.

Commit no violence

And fear no violence.

Keep the faith,

Do good.

This is our land.

We made it what it is

“And we shall be fed.”

 

Forever the rich

Plot against the poor.

Are they even conscience-stricken,

Ashamed of their work?

Their history smells of death,

Pestilence

And horror.

They boast of progress and peace

When they make war;

These makers of money and poverty.

 

The many go to the grave,

Divided and pillaged

By the few,

Invoking their God.

To sanction All, all

To the very end –

The burial price.

Yet we live

In spite of this

Joyfully.

Laugh with our little.

 

I.

Who envies

The makers

Of this evil

And sees the future

As theirs?

Then shall you be brought

To a stand-still

Condemned to catalepcia,

The real purgatory.

And you and they

Shall be cut off forever,

By the dream of the day

Of the upright,

Who shall have overcome.

 

II.

I climbed the mountain

And I could see,

From on high,

Flowers growing

Where the garbage used to be.

Because they are divided,

Because they are helpless,

They submit,

Robbed

Of precious labor and lifetime,

With contempt.

 

III.

I touch the golden evil

The open-sesame

Of the system.

I place my finger

On the atomic button

Of change

And I die for this.

 

Copyright, Library of Congress, 2003